Japanese people in general seem to have excellent skills in data visualization, as well as quite advanced mathematical ability and a robust approach to science. Japanese appreciation of data visualization, particularly, seems to exceed anything similar in the West (at least, that I’m familiar with). In my favourite magazine, Tokyo Graffiti, for example, ordinary people are regularly asked to describe their hairstyle or their favorite shoes in terms of spider charts, a form of data visualization also used to describe the fruit and vegetables at my local supermarket. The local guide to hot springs in Steamy Beppu contains a chart that plots key ingredients of the hot spring water on two axes, and then clusters the data into areas through different coloured data points so that you can easily judge which tourist area to visit depending on your health needs. Most pamphlets about health issues in Japan include a brief description of the epidemiological evidence, and usually a chart or two that lay out the data in a visually attractive way.
Of course it’s not the case that these representational methods are unique to Japan, but what is unique is their degree of dissemination, with ordinary shops using them to depict basic information about their products, and information that would be reserved for the fine print (or not presented at all) in the UK or Australia being given front page, graphical representation under the assumption that even the most ordinarily-educated of individuals is capable of understanding it. This is both a refreshing assumption about the mental capacity of the average consumer on the part of ordinary companies, and a huge bonus for your average statistician. People not only understand the basic idea of what I do, but they appreciate it and think it’s cool. This is, to say the least, a novelty.
Of course this has come to the fore in the last week, when the nuclear “crisis” hit. The Japanese media have been very quick to present detailed diagrams of the nuclear plants, and used all sorts of cute charts to give clear presentation of the risks of radiation, in a refreshingly straightforward and unpatronizing way that assumes the best of the audience. The channel I was watching in Beppu, NHK, even had a guy whose official job was “Explainer” (説明者)。They also presented a variety of basic charts and pictorial representations (especially the triangle describing risk) clearly and directly. But the best example I’ve seen so far of presentation of this data is this visualization, which unfortunately for most of my readers is in Japanese. Here is an explanation:
The visualization has 12 little pictures in 3 lines of 4. The top 4 show (left to right) the world average hourly exposure; the upper limit for a worker who deals with radiation; the amount required for a 0.5% increase in cancer risk; and the amount at which you should run for the hills. The next 8 boxes (left to right, top to bottom) are places in Japan. The first (left-most of the middle row) is the Western edge of the Fukushima exclusion zone. To its right are three towns heavily affected by the Tsunami. On the bottom left is my colleague, Ms. Middle-of-the-River’s hometown of Saitama. Next is my friend Miss Wisteria Village’s workplace of Chiba; then is an area near me; and lastly is a town near Yokohama to the Southwest of Tokyo. These places are all in the Greater Kanto area so some distance from the plant, but as you can see from the falling dots, they have a similar amount of “rain” to those in the area around the plant.
This is classic visualization material, giving an engaging presentation of key facts in such a way that visual comparisons are easily done without losing key basic information. It’s also done with the classic Japanese minimalist aesthetic, and somehow manages to produce an overall calming image, while giving a clear sense of panic to the danger zone image while smoothly contrasting it with the reality that surrounds it.
I don’t know why the Japanese are so good at and familiar with visualization, but I think that their writing system, being pictorial, must be connected in some way. Is this also true of China and Korea? They are also countries with world famous mathematical education, and a pictorial writing system, but I don’t know enough about them to judge. I am, however, confident that less foreigners would have run away from Tokyo if the English-speaking world were more comfortable with this sort of representational style.
March 30, 2011 at 2:56 am
A very good graphic!
It’s certainly the case that the manner by which spoken numbers in some Asian languages (Chinese, Japanese and Korean were the examples I recall) correspond to their written form (15 as “ten five” and 25 as “two ten five for example) is thought to give the native speakers of such languages some advantage in learning basic numeracy during childhood over their, for example, European counterparts whose spoken numbers are considerably less regular. This was thought to remain a factor even after accounting for other considerations such as the greater regard for science and education in such cultures for example. It is not the most dominant factor of course, children of equally motivated parents who assisted with schooling showed less differentiation in ability regardless of language.
It is interesting to note that despite this advantage the decimal Hindu (Arabic) numeral system appears to have superseded their own written form (presumably non positional) but that’s probably just a requirement of the modern world.
March 30, 2011 at 7:31 am
On th topic of Japanese numbers, I’ll aways recall my surprise that they didn’t adapt the decimal system to suit their language better.
The Japanese have a term for 10,000 “man” [1] that roughly corresponds with they way thousands are used in English. As in you one thousand or ten thousand in English but in Japanese you’d could out all your ten thousands then toss man on the end. So ichiman is 10,000 or juman in 100,000. [2]
The reason this stunned me was that I have a had time counting the number of 0s in a number, then mentally marking the 10,000 point, then saying the >10,000 numbers, then saing man, then saying the <10,000 numbers.
Why didn't they move the comma! If they had numbers would be a joy to read nd I wouldn't have to start from the right of the number, work my way through it, then say it!
[1] I'm aware that several readers of this blog re much better versed in Japanese than I am, but I figured I may as well explain my understanding rather than assume all readers know what I'm talking about.
[2] They also have a word for thousand that works in a similar way to English, but the 10,000 cut off is much more direct as it basically restarts your counting again with the 10,000 count being a logical break point in the number.
March 30, 2011 at 8:05 am
Martin, I’ve always found it hard to believe that something as simple as how numbers are thought about can make mathematics development significantly easier; but then I struggle, as Paul does, with the 10,000 denomination, so I suppose it would work. I suspect a high quality mathematics education and a society that takes science seriously, and sees being a nerd as completely acceptable[1] is a large part of it though.
The 10,000 denomination is very strange. So many times when I have to say “million” I have to stop and do the numbers in my head – it’s easy for me to think of a thousand thousands, but I stumble over a hundred ten thousands.
—
fn1: Recently there have been adverts on TV and trains for the PSP game Monster Hunter, aimed entirely at girls.
March 30, 2011 at 11:46 pm
I think it just provides a bit of a boost in learning base 10 arithmetic, because the position and hence value of numbers is implicit in their name. I don’t think there’s any suggestion that it might help beyond that into higher mathematics – beyond any momentum gained from the early advantage.
Not heard of the 10,000’s thing in Japanese. Presumably this is obligatory? Even if they have a thousands denomination, as soon as you exceed 10,000 you have to start counting “man”. I guess it’s similar to the US/UK billion thang.
We should all be using base 12 anyway. Fingers and toes don’t help so much but the arithmetic is meant to be so much easier because of all the common factors.
March 31, 2011 at 10:57 am
I’m continually shocked by my instinctive abhorrence of suggestions to use a different counting system (i.e. base 12). It’s like my brain says “But then 10 would only be 10/12 of the way to the next digit…” and rejects that as being conceivable.
That said, DEATH TO THOSE WHO PUSH BASE 12! BASE 10 FOREVER!
I said I was shocked by my response. Not that I didn’t agree with it after further reflection.
March 31, 2011 at 2:01 pm
Yeah, base 5 is supposed to be the way to go – you can count the tens on one hand and the units on the other; then you can use toes to count hundreds, and toes to count thousands, which means you can count up to 5^4-1(624) with shoes off. But why would you bother?
Interestingly, the Japanese abacus (soroban) operates in base 5, so I wonder if back in the dim dark days before Momotaro, the Japanese used fingers and toes to count…
April 1, 2011 at 5:58 am
Would toes be any good to count with when your counting system revolves around having them up/down (which base 5 would) versus just pointing at them (which is all base 10 needs)?
I suspect not.
April 1, 2011 at 7:59 am
You’ve thought about this way too much, haven’t you?
Actually I think for the toes to flip over, your right hand (which is counting the 1s) has to at some point reach 0. So you can invest in some kind of wedge-like device to keep the toes separated (let’s refer to this wedge-like device as a “tool”).
At this point you might think, hmm, I could count higher if I had 10 columns instead of 4, and promptly invent the abacus. Followed soon after, of course, by the hybrid car.
April 1, 2011 at 8:57 am
If you want to maximise your counting then base two is still the best I know of. 1023 max on your fingers, 2^20-1 if you were properly arranging your toes using your theoretical tool. [1]
Furthermore, a binary counting system would lead to computing followed by internet porn, which is a vastly improved cultural arc to your pathetic planet saving car.
[1] Yes, I have thought about it. And I’ve rejected tools like that as being to fiddly. But with binary other body parts can be used, such feet, elbows, etc. [2]
[2] Which raises the posibility of getting an incorrect count when an attractive girl walks by [3]
[3] Yes that’s juvenile of me. But I can’t resist the silliness of the concept.